Why I Chose to Join AttackIQ as a Senior Advisor
Originally published on AttackIQ, 18 February 2026. Summary below; the full article is linked at the end.
After nearly three decades in operational defence, product strategy and industry research, including leading within the Chief Security Office at Lloyds Banking Group, I have watched the same pattern repeat. Leaders are handed more exposure data every year and less clarity about what to do with it. Findings multiply; decisions do not.
I joined AttackIQ's advisory board because I think the industry has to move from identifying exposures to helping leaders understand which ones matter, in the order the adversary would actually use them.
What I argue in the piece
From exposure to clarity: fragmented risk indicators must give way to adversary-aligned attack paths that tell a leadership team what to fix first and why.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management is the operating model: a disciplined loop connecting business priorities to threat-informed discovery, prioritisation and validation.
AI accelerates both sides. Structured, threat-informed decision support is how organisations keep innovation velocity without surrendering resilience.
The same principle underpins Pinpoint Security: give boards the evidence and the framing to make confident decisions, not another dashboard.
Read the full article on AttackIQ: Why I Chose to Join AttackIQ as a Senior Advisor.
Comments